March 6, 2025 – Bridgeport, Connecticut
Five individuals accused of fraud in the Bridgeport election case appeared in court today, facing charges related to alleged absentee ballot tampering in the city’s 2023 mayoral election. The defendants include City Council members Alfredo Castillo, Maria Pereira, and Jazmarie Melendez, along with Democratic Town Committee Vice Chair Wanda Geter-Pataky and Stratford resident Margaret Joyce.
Charges and Allegations
Authorities have charged the defendants with multiple election law violations, including fraudulent voting and misrepresenting absentee ballot eligibility. The case stems from an investigation launched after surveillance footage surfaced, appearing to show individuals depositing multiple absentee ballots into drop boxes before the Democratic primary.
The footage, released by former mayoral candidate John Gomes, who narrowly lost the primary to incumbent Mayor Joe Ganim, raised serious concerns over election integrity. Following an extensive inquiry, officials arrested the five individuals in February 2025.
Court Proceedings
During the arraignment at Bridgeport Superior Court, Judge Scott M. Jones set the next court date for March 21. The case will be transferred to the Bridgeport Judicial District Courthouse, which handles more serious criminal matters.
The defendants were ordered to avoid contact with any witnesses listed in the arrest affidavits. They were released on promises to appear at the next hearing.
Defendants Maintain Innocence
“I didn’t do anything wrong. I get out the vote. That’s what I do.”
Outside the courthouse, Alfredo Castillo denied any wrongdoing, stating.
“They will not get a single conviction.”
Maria Pereira echoed his sentiments, asserting.
Attorneys for the remaining defendants either declined to comment or were unavailable for statements.
Background and Impact
The controversy surrounding the 2023 mayoral election led to a court-ordered redo of both the primary and general elections, both of which were again won by Mayor Ganim. The allegations have intensified concerns about election security and the handling of absentee ballots in Bridgeport, Connecticut’s largest city.
As the legal proceedings unfold, the case is being closely monitored by election officials, political analysts, and the public. Many believe the outcome could have broader implications for future election policies in the state.
The next hearing on March 21 will likely provide more insight into the prosecution’s case and the potential consequences for the defendants.
